By John E. Carey and
Honglien
September 8, 2006
For the last three weeks, Vietnam has detained an
American who was born in Vietnam and works in conjunction with an anti-communist
group that wants a multiparty system in Vietnam.
Cong Thanh Do, 47, of San Jose, California, has been held in Ho Chi Minh City,
Vietnam without charges since August 17, 2006. He was visiting family in
Vietnam, and traveling with his wife and son according to family members in
California and Vietnam’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Le Dung.
Mr. Do is a member of "The Peoples Democratic Party of Viet Nam," which is what
might be called "the movement" or "the underground," to put it in the parlance
of WWII.
In a letter from Reporters Without Borders on September 6, 2006, that
organization asked the U.S., French and Finnish ambassadors in Hanoi to
intervene.
The letter said in part:
"Five people are currently imprisoned in Vietnam for having expressed democratic
views on the Internet. Contrary to the claims of the Vietnamese authorities,
none of them is a terrorist, criminal or spy. These men have been punished for
using the Internet to publicly express their disagreement with the political
line of the sole party. They are non-violent democrats.”
Vietnam is a communist nation. Many of us have forgotten what that means.
Vietnam has no freedom of press, no freedom of speech and no opposition party.
Internet access is severely restricted and monitored in Vietnam.
On August 28, 2006, Vietnam announced the release of prominent dissident and
pro-democracy activist Pham Hong Son. Son was originally sentenced to five years
in prison. His crime? He translated articles from the U.S. State Department web
site for an online journal. The articles were titled "What is democracy?"
Vietnam tightly controls freedom of speech and many western web sites are
blocked and not accessible.
In Vietnam, starting in the 2006-2007 school year, all high schools must provide
accredited and extensive IT education to all students. Each high school must
also be equipped with a computer center with at least 25 computers connected to
the Internet.
These reforms are dictated by the Communist Party's Ministry of Education and
Training.The Vietnamese leaders believe that by making their youth more computer
savvy, the nation will reap the great benefits of a surging economy for many
years to come.
But the Vietnamese leaders, like the Communists in China, want to control the
internet, read all email, monitor usage by individuals , and limit access to
many western sites. Prohibited search words include "democracy," "freedom," and
"declaration of independence." Many sites Americans take for granted are
prohibited in Vietnam and China: like my own Washington Times (most articles
much of the time).
Also in August, Vietnam received international attention when it arrested staff
members who worked for a foreign bank. The government of Vietnam was demanding
their employer pay "compensation" to a state-owned bank for the $5.4 million it
lost in speculative foreign-exchange trades.
The Wall Street Journal reported on August 28, “the appalling treatment of staff
of the Dutch bank ABN-AMRO, caught up in what even Vietnamese regulators say
were legitimate business transactions. The story highlights how, for all its
strides toward a market economy, this Communist state is still not always a safe
place to do business. In Hanoi, Tom O'Dore, chairman of the American Chamber of
Commerce Vietnam, says ‘This particular case reeks of human-rights abuses.’”
"They're criminalizing what appears to be a legitimate business transaction,"
Mr. O’Dore says.
"This is very bewildering in a country that's trying to get into WTO and sends
an inappropriate message to the U.S. Congress."
Vietnam is trying to enter the WTO and they are trying to get most favored trade
status from us here in the USA. They are taking a lot of steps to make
themselves look as free and normal as European democracies but the truth is
difficult for them to cover over.
Despite some window dressing appeals to the west, like releasing prisoners that
they can easily re-arrest just after they get whatever they want from us, the
leaders of Vietnam do not seem to completely grasp how shallow their small acts
of kindness seem when they arrest someone like Mr. Do for weeks without a formal
charge.
Yes, Vietnam has been releasing prisoners to impress the west with their
"reforms of government." Vietnam has released, in fact, more than 5 thousand
prisoners; but only 4 of them are prisoners of conscience, and most of the rest
are communist officers who were sentenced to jail for their "crimes of
corruption."
Vietnam's record on Human Rights is no joke. Cong Thanh Do, like most
Vietnamese-born Americans who return to Vietnam, was visiting family. Often the
parents and grandparents stay behind in Vietnam and American family members
naturally want to visit.
We don’t hear much about Vietnam. They have no missiles. They pose no apparent
threat to their regional neighbors. But the leaders in Vietnam terrorize their
own people and this places them into a special category that should interest all
of us. Religious repression continues in Vietnam. In Vietnam, police are allowed
to hold suspects without charges for more than a year.
The case of Cong Thanh Do stands as testament to how far Vietnam still has to
travel before foreign governments can have faith in their words; as opposed to
their continued actions in opposition to normally accepted international norms
of civility and freedom.
Vietnam seeks entry into the World Trade Organization. Some in America say WTO
entry will make Vietnam institute more relaxed laws toward those now deemed
dissidents.
But WTO entry is no panacea, with China's 2001 accession failing to halt its
abuses.
In the case of the staff of the Dutch bank ABN-AMRO, The Wall Street Journal
said, “In the free world, governments don't go around abducting a competitor's
staff over a business dispute. Until state-owned companies are forced to live
with the consequences of bad business deals -- or resolve disputes through the
legal system -- Vietnam can never expect to become a full-fledged member of the
world business community.”
In the case of Cong Thanh Do there is simply no excuse for the conduct of
Vietnam. Mr. Do only wants to leave Vietnam and return to his home in the United
States.
Vietnam needs to start behaving as other civilized nations act. And Vietnam
needs to start acting in accordance with its own long-term self-interests.
Visit our special section on Vietnam:
http://peace-and-freedom.blogspot.com/
2006_07_11_peace-and-freedom_archive.html